Abstract
[In this study, the main aspects of the economical,
technological, political, and cultural process called
"globalization", which has been affecting
our world during the past few years, as well as its
possible effects on mental health, and organization
of mental health services are discussed.]
We Really Live In A Different World Right Now!
Sociologist Anhony Giddens, who answers the question
"Is this world we live on during the end of the
twentieth century different than the previous ages?"
with "Yes, it is", considers globalization
as a political, technological, and cultural process,
rather than just economical. According to him, the gigantic
changes, which occurred in the field of communication
form the basis for the globalization process, and has
a major affect on all related aspects. For the first
time in the history, we have the chance to communicate
with other parts of the world, instantly. Instant electronic
communication is not just a way to transmit news or
data faster and more efficient. The presence of instant
communication leads to changes in the basic structure
of our lives, no matter if we are poor or rich. (Giddens
2000, p. 24).
Not Only The World, Our Lives Change Completely!
Together with the fundamental changes in the infrastructure
of information technologies, the main focus of the economy
shifted from industry towards service sector, which
lead to major changes in our lives. When services in
the fields of information, entertainment, electronics,
and finance became the vital essence of the economy,
our lives begin to be shaped accordingly.
Except those changes, which originate from the business
life, our new life-style which result form information
technologies makes it necessary for us to think of globalization
as a "local" process in our immediate vicinity,
which deeply affects the private and personal aspects
of our lives (sex, marriage, family), rather than something
"remote". During the recent years, terms such
as "here" and "there", "inside"
and "outside", "far" and "close"
don't mean anything especially to the elite section,
but progressively also to everybody who make use of
information technologies. Any event, which happens in
one part of the world concerns anybody in any other
part of the planet.
The advances in transportation means also contribute
to our global movements, erasing geographic borders
from our lives (Baumann 1999a, p.20). As a result, global
changes occur in the way we think of ourselves, and
how we establish relationships with others. The most
important aspect of globalization that affects our mental
health is changes in cultural life, i.e. the human side
of it.
When Traditions Get Lost, Our Ego-Identities
Become Restored!
Due to changes in information technologies, traditions
began to lose their importance world-wide, and the fundamentals
of our "self" perception and feeling started
to shake. In traditional populations, the self-feeling
and the ego-identity is preserved mainly by stability
of roles and status of individuals within the society.
With the loss of traditions, the "self-feeling"
and the "ego-identity" has to be reconstructed.
According to Giddens (2000, p.61), the main task of
psychotherapy and psychoanalysis nowadays is to answer
this need for reconstruction of this "self".
This sociological analysis of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis
by Giddens offers us the opportunity to reveal how this
kind of approaches, such as "object relationships"
and self-psychology come about, as well as indicates,
although "cross-cultural psychiatry" and "culture-specific
psychotherapy" desires (Göka, 1997) became popular
recently, they will never be able to hit the target.
Together with globalization, it becomes more and more
evident that the main development behind the discussions
about multi-culturalism (Gutman, 1996) is a single-culturalism,
i.e. a kind of homogenization. Our life-styles become
standardized. Together with globalization, the Western-type
of economical behavior becomes assimilated by the rest
of the world (Yıldırım 2000, p.74). There are critics
that the Internet has been designed to make whole world
think like Northern Americans do (De Benoist 1996, p.120).
The family structure becomes dissolved, and privacy,
love, and erotism acquire a new shape!
Traditional family was an economical unit. In the medieval
Europe, marriage was not related to sexual love, and
family home, was not considered to be a place where
sexual love would grow; usually women and children were
devoid of any rights. Today, on the other hand, we talk
about the "death of the family", like about
the death of many other things. Marriage may still be
popular, but this comes together with increases in divorces,
and marriage is not a definitive factor of being a couple.
Due to high rate of marriage and divorces in countries,
such as the UK and the USA, they are referred to as
"high divorce, high marriage" societies. In
some other countries, more than one third of all birth
cases are extra-marital, with the rate of single living
people increasing, and birth-rates decreasing in Western
world.
In recent years, this wave starting from the West spreads
to whole world; with sexuality completely becomes separated
from reproduction, sexual life undergoes a fundamental
change. Equality between two sexes, as well as sexual
freedom, which does not confirm to traditional family
concept, starts its way. Together with mother-father-child
relationship, sexual relationships and love relations
also change (Giddens 1996).
When we combine all these changes in privacy the revolution
in information technologies, we can easily say that
the shape and content of mental disorders, and consequently
of psychological treatments, psychotherapies in the
first place, will undergo serious changes (Göka 1999).
Translocations in globalization are really tragic sometimes;
and longer life-expectancy may also lead to several
problems!
Even though not related to globalization directly,
another important field of change of our lives is reflected
in increases in population, migrations, and aging of
the world's population (Thurow 1997, p.74-97). Higher
population rates in poor countries indicate that in
addition to general health problems, mental health problems
will also increase in these countries. Although together
with globalization, tourism from Western countries to
other places of the world reaches a level to deserve
the term "migration", the real problem from
the point of view of mental health is mass-migrations
to developed Western countries. We shall better be prepared
to cruel measures to stop mass-migrations, and to poor
migrating populations, whose mental integrities are
lost, with severe symptoms during the next years.
The increase in the population of elderly has lead
to a completely new social class, first time in the
history of mankind. This group of people, who are economically
not active, who vote, and whose number is steadily increasing,
is one of the most important powers to reshape the world.
Elderly people are those who require expensive social
services, such as health, and whose main source of income
is normally the government. Depending on the level of
development and social policy of the countries, the
services offered to elderly also vary. In the US, which
is governed by information and money, we can easily
predict that major investments are going to be made
on the biology, psychology, and rehabilitation of elderly,
thus more pages about senility problems will be added
to psychiatry textbooks, whereas due to limited resources
of mental health professionals in other parts of the
world (including Europe), they will not be able to apply
these information to the elder population in their own
country.
Fanaticism Booms While Traditions Collapse!
Another result of the collapse of traditions during
the globalization process, is the danger of fundamentalism
(Giddens 2000, p.61-63; Thurow 1997, p.195-202). Fundamentalism
means in its broadest sense the desire for the past;
a tradition under siege. Fundamentalism is the reaction
for globalization; the state of closing your eyes and
retreating to your inner-self; thus, it can not stand
polyphonicy, and refuses dialogues. We should bear in
mind, however, that fundamentalism should be considered
not only in the religious sense, but also from any kind
of ethnical, nationalistic, and political aspects; fundamentalist
reactions may occur in any part of the world (e.g. capitulations
in the Western countries, conservative reaction against
female emancipation, etc.) The importance of fundamentalism
from the mental health point of view is that it forms
a social tool for violence and fanaticism. It sometimes
reaches the level of a "paranoid endemic",
and the mental health professional who becomes stuck
between individual-culture and psychopathology is devoid
of any means to interfere, and only can observe the
events.
Global Individual Is Someone Who Lives In The
Risk Society!
Anybody who seeks to understand globulazation under
the term "risk" (Beck 1992), displays a psychosocial
reality, to which mental health professionals have to
react. In traditional societies, there might have been
more real dangers from the nature, or other people,
but still they were not "risk societies".
Because risk refers to dangers which are efficiently
evaluated by considering future possibilities; thus,
it is true only for modern societies which are future-oriented,
and which attempt to break free from the past. Our modern
society has a certain level of control over external
dangers from the nature or from traditions, but self-manufactured
risks, which result from the effect of our knowledge
on the world, environmental problems, arming, nuclear
hazards, and labile finance markets may lead to greater
disasters, instantly (Giddens 2000, p.35-48).
Globalization may mean that progressively increasing
ecological problems becoming global, an unsolved ecological
problem to bear the risk of destroying the whole planet.
Self-manufactured risks are not limited to this; previously
certain predetermined patterns of marriage and child-raising
limited mainly by traditions did not cause any problems
related to uncertainty. Nowadays, however, there is
tremendous level of uncertainty in these fields, and
the individual has to determine which way to choose.
If we add the problem with deadly venereal diseases,
such as AIDS, to the risk areas of globalizing world,
we can easily understand why we are living in the "anxiety
age". The best way to deal with risks is to get
insured; these are the reasons for the insurance system
to be developed in the risk society. But what kind of
mental health insurance can we find for the anxiety-inducing
atmosphere of globalization? Will this be primarily
a preventive effort, or should we expect some kind of
advances in the field of anxiolytic medications; unfortunately,
this also remains uncertain.
Are Nation-States, National Economies, And
National Health Policies Collapsing?
Another result of globalization is best explained by
the statement of sociologist Daniel Bell, saying that
the nation is too small to solve big problems, and too
big to solve small problems (Bell 1987). Together with
globalization in the political and economic stage of
the world, especially two powers are steadily regressing.
Those are nation-states and poor Southern countries.
In spite of intensive debates about globalization and
the future of nation-states (Hirst and Thomson 1998;
Rodrik 1999), it is quite obvious that together with
the process of globalization nation-countries and especially
social-welfare governments are losing steam.
This fact is clearly indicated by fifty of the worlds'
greates economic powers being enterprises rather than
countries, and by the assets of the richest three man
of the world being higher than the income of 48 nation-countries,
in other words, one third of the worlds' population
(Başkaya 1999, p.21). We can not expect national economical
policies being as effective as they were in the past,
and the historical geopolitical concept has undergone
changes. National identities need to be reformed; similar
to "family", "job", "tradition",
and "family" concepts, the concept of "nation"
is undergoing fundamental changes during recent years.
The gap, which results from erosion and regression of
national identity, is filled with ethnical and cultural
solutions on behalf of multi-culturalism.
The relationship of the negative aspect of globalization
for national countries with mental health consists of
the deep concern, suspicions, violence and conflict
environment resulting from the chaos, which is a consequence
of loss of national identity, and the burden on people
with mental disorders and their families because of
the retreat from social policies.
A negative effect of regression of nation-states on
mental health comes from a totally unexpected field:
In a world where world problems remain uncertain and
without any rules and a control mechanism, the mafia
is free to move as it wishes. In the year 1995, it was
predicted that the drug business has reached a volume
of 4000 Billion Dollars. This figure constitutes 8%
of the total business volume in the world, and exceeds
the share of iron-steel and automotive industries (Bozkurt
2000, p.109). The social aspect of a drug market with
no control mechanism naturally affects the field of
psychiatry!
Is Globalization Neutral?
Globalization is apparently not a neutral process,
and its effects are advantageous only for "Northern"
people, more specifically the US, and disturbs lots
of people who are living outside of Northern countries.
The poor people of South whose local cultures disappear
progressively, and who feel the inequality in their
lives to a higher degree with every passing day perceive
globalization as "becoming Western" and "becoming
American", and are in deep doubts and suspicions
about their future. There are circles claiming that
this is the most important feature of the feeling of
"non-Western countries being continuously watched-over
by Western ones, and the Western people always see and
know everything", and define the process as "cybernetic
exploitation" (Sid-Ahmed 1996, p.17-21). We have
to keep the global psychological environment of the
poor Southern people who are covered with millions of
satellites and hundred thousands of cables extending
from Atlantic to Pacific shore in mind.
Actually, if we consider globalization from the point
of view of social inequality, statistics are frightening.
It is adequate to scan through the "1999 humanistic
development report" of the UN, or the reports of
the World Bank (Global Economic Prospects 1998/1999).
The share of the poorest one fifth of the world population
on the global income has decreased to 1.4% from 2.3%
during 1989 and 1999. The security and environmental
arrangements of the poor Southern countries is at a
very low level, or is totally missing. Some international
companies sell items here that are prohibited in their
own countries, such as low-quality medical equipment,
harmful insecticides. The present picture of the world
is a global pillage, rather than a global village (Giddens
2000, p.27).
The present picture in this world, where the total
assets of 358 global billionaires is equal to total
income of 45% of world's total population can be described
as a new way of "robbery" (Keegan 1996). Moreover,
in the past the rich people needed the poor to become
rich and to preserve their fortunes; today, on the other
hand, after the change in the nature of "working",
rich people no longer need the poor. The poor people
are left to their destinies (Bauman 1999b)...
The distribution of income during globalization process
doesn't only lead to inequality between North and South;
all the developmental determinants focus on the US.
The USA, which is the supporting beam of the present
international system, has acquired half of the increase
in income during the last two years (Ulagay 1999, p.85).
Looking from this point of view, globalization process
is also referred as "Americanization of the world"
(Gerbier 1999, p.107).
In addition, if we consider social inequality, globalization
also leads to reactions even in the poorer parts of
the North. While poor people are left to misery in the
city centers, the elite layer lives in fancy places
outside of the cities. The stress between the ones inside
and outside of the walls increases in the same manner
as described by Gregory Bateson in "Schismogenetic
chain theory" (1973, p.41-42); according to this
theory, if eternal competition is not limited and changes
into enmity, the collapse of the system is inevitable.
Occasional demonstrations of the poor, clashes with
the police, which become a kind of ritual nowadays,
attacks of soccer fanatics might be the first sign of
the violence potential of the cities. The fear factor
in our new postmodern cities is certainly growing, as
indicated by endless news warning the citizens, as spread
by the media, by cars and doors always getting locked,
and widespread security systems, by the increase of
"closed" and "secure" communities
among all age and income groups, and by the increased
level of control in public places (Elin 1997, p.13).
Not only the huge gap in the distribution of income,
but also McDonaldization (Ritzer 2000), and consumption-oriented
structure of the society (Featherstone 1996) causes
heavy critics. There are also some serious critics about
the information technologies, which form the backbone
of globalization. Some sociologists (Bauman 1999a, p.60;
Poster 1996, p.204) compare our bodies to networks,
data bases, or beads lined along information corridors,
and claim that we live in a world where we can not escape
from being watched, and can't do anything but watch
the information stars.
And in a world where traditions, family, nation-states,
social policies are regressing, whereas the inequality
of income distribution is increasing, liberal suggestions
do not work in case the problems are mental disorders,
especially severe and long-lasting mental disorders
which are hard, even impossible to cure. "Socially
responsible globalization" which is currently discussed
for problems related to globalization, is especially
needed for mental disorders, too (Bozkurt 2000, p.108;
Ulagay 1999).
All these changes indicate the need for new ideas for
the mental health concept and organization of services.
We especially need to review the public supporting system
concept, which has vital importance for mental health
services, and properly refill the gaps caused by the
loss of tradition and family effects (Göka 2001).
Globalization Of Science And Technology, And
The Unpredictable Results Of The Bio-Technologic Revolution!
Another fact of the present times is that science and
technology themselves have been globalized. The number
of scientists all around the world today exceeds the
total number of people who made efforts in this field
for the whole history of mankind; just like the number
of the deaths during the two World Wars, and the recent
ethnical struggles exceeds the number of people who
died in wars throughout the history...
Meanwhile, the concept of "science" also
undergoes some changes. In the past, we were talking
about social sciences imitating natural sciences, while
nowadays we discuss the similarity of natural sciences
to social sciences. Terms, such as "uncertainty",
"probability", and "interpretation"
are emphasized (Göka, Topçuoğlu, Aktay 1996; Gulbenkian
Commission 1996). This situation reflected itself to
psychiatric etiology and management discussions as "multiple-factor"
concept.
But meanwhile the advances in genetic sciences and
biotechnology, which have enlivened the claim of "precise
scientific knowledge of truth" of the last centuries'
positivism are close to create the most important changes
of near future (Giddens 2000, p.46). In the middle of
the year 2000 Clinton and Blair have announced that
"Human Genome Project" (HUGO) has been completed,
and this is even a greater revolution than information
reform. Several states and pharmacological companies
are about to take important steps in the field of biotechnology
(Miller 2000). While we were talking about socio-biology
in the past, we began to talk about "bio-sociality",
meaning reformation of the community according to biology.
The advances in genetics and biotechnology, when combined
with steps in the field of behavioral genetics (Hamer
and Copeland, 2000), it is possible to state that in
the following years there will be fundamental changes
related to mental health, from etiology to management,
and at the same time, the ongoing discussions related
to ethics will quickly turn out to be real ethic problems.
Psychiatry, which was influenced from inside and outside
by the public criticism wave of 1968, now seems to become
influenced by the wave of criticism against globalization
coming from Seattle, and any other places. The critics
against psychiatry will now apparently originate from
patient rights, and psychiatry will be accused to be
at the service of "eugenics" and international
concerns.
References
Başkaya F. 1999. Küreselleşme mi, Emperyalizm mi? Piyasacı
efsanenein çöküşü. Ütopya Yayınları, Ankara.
Bateson G. 1073. Steps to An Ecology of Mind. Frogmore,
Paladin.
Bauman Z. 1999a. Küreselleşme: Toplumsal Sonuçları
(Globalization: The Human Consequences). Abdullah Yılmaz.
Çeviren. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
Bauman Z. 1999b. Çalışma, Tüketicilik ve Yeni Yoksullar
(Work, Consumerism and The New Poor). Ümit Öktem. Çeviren.
Sarmal yayınları, İstanbul.
Beck U. 1992. The Risk Society: Towards Another Modernity.
Sage, London.
Bell D. 1987. The World and United States in 2013.
Daedalus, 116:3.1-31.
Bozkurt V. Küreselleşmenin toplumsal sonuçları. "Küreselleşmenin
İnsani Yüzü" içinde. Veysel Bozkurt. Derleyen.
Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.
De Benoist A. 1996. Confronting globalization. Telos,
108:117-138.
Elin N. 1997. Shelter from the Storm, or Form Follows
Fear and Vice Versa. İn " Architecture of Fear"
Elin N. Editor. New York, Princeton Architectural Press.
Featherstone M. 1996. Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü
(Consumer Culture and Postmodernism). Mehmet Küçük.
Çeviren. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
Gerbier B. 1999. Kapitalizmin bugünkü aşaması olarak
geo-ekonomik emperyalizm. "Küreselleşme mi, Emperyalizm
mi?" içinde. Fikret Başkaya. Derleyen. Ütopya Yayınları,
Ankara.
Giddens A. 1996. Mahremiyetin Dönüşümü: Modern Toplumlarda
Cinsellik, Aşk ve Erotizm (The Transformation of Intimacy
Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies).
İdris Şahin. Çeviren. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
Giddens A. 2000. Elimizden Kaçıp Giden Dünya (Runaway
World). Osman Akınhay. Çeviren. Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.
Global Economic Prospects and Developing Countries.
1998/1999. www.worldbank.org/prospect/gep98-99.
Göka E. 1997. Freud ve Nietzsche: Postmodern durumda
psikiyatrinin geleceği için bazı sezgiler. "Varoluşun
Psikiyatrisi" içinde. Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.,
183-191.
Göka E. 1999. Zamanın ruhu insanın ruhunu döver mi?
"Bilimlerin Vicdanı Psikiyatri" içinde. Ütopya
Yayınları, Ankara.
Göka E., Topçuoğlu A., Aktay Y. 1996. Önce söz Vardı:
Yorumsamacılık Üzerine Bir Deneme. Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
Göka 2001. Ruh sağlığı hizmetlerinde organizasyon sorunları.
www.drerolgoka.20m.com
Gulbenkian Komisyonu. 1996. Sosyal Bilimleri Açın (Open
The Social Sciences). Şirin Tekeli. Çeviren. Metis Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Gutman A. 1996. Çokkültürcülük: Tanınma Politikası
(Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition).
Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
Hamer D., Copeland P. Genlerimizle yaşamak: Onlar,
Neden sandığımızdan daha Önemli ( Living with Our Genes:
Why They matter More Than You Think). Fatih Özbay. Çeviren.
Evrim Yayınları, İstanbul.
Hirst P., Thomson G. 1998. Küreselleşme Sorgulanıyor
(Globalization in Question). Dost Kitabevi Yayınları,
Ankara.
Human Development Report. 1999. Globalization with
a Human Face. www.undp.org/hdro/99.htm
Keegan V. 1996. Highway robbery by the supper-rich.
The Guardian 22 July.
Miller Kl. 2000. The Biotech Boom. Newsweek, October
30.
Poster M. 1996. Database as discourse, or electronic
iinterpellations. İn "Detraditionalization"
Heelas P, Lash S. Morris P. Editors. Oxford; Blackwell.
Rifkin J. 1998. Biyoteknoloji Yüzyılı. Genlerden Yararlanma
ve Dünyayı Yeniden Kurma. (Harnesing the Gene and Remaking
the World The biotech Century). Celal Kpakın. Çeviren.
Evrim Yayınları, İstanbul.
Ritzer 2000. Toplumun McDonaldlaştırılması (The McDonaldisation
of Society). Şen Süer Kaya. Çeviren. Ayrıntı Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Rodrik D. 1999. Küreselleşme Sınırı Aştı mı? (Has Globalization
Gone Too Far?) İzzet Akyol-Fatma Ünsal. Çevirenler.
Kızıl Elma Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Sid-Ahmed M. 1996. Sibernetik Sömürgecilik ve ahlaki
arayış. NPQ (New Perspectives Ouarterly) Türkiye. 3:9.
Thurow LC. 1997. Kapitalizmin Geleceği. ( The Future
of Capitalism). Serpil Demirtaş- Nebil İlseven. Çevirenler.
Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul.
Ulagay O. 1999. Quo Vadis? Küreselleşmenin İki Yüzü.
Doğan Kitap, İstanbul.
Yıldırım E. 2000. Küreselleşme, refah devleti ve risk
toplumu. "Küreselleşmenin İnsani Yüzü" içinde.
Veysel Bozkurt. Derleyen. Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.